the case can go on

And in Doucet-Boudreau v. Nova Scotia (Minister of Education)2003 SCC 62, the Supreme Court recalled that because of the requirement of the “substantiating number”, the rights guaranteed by theSection 23 are “particularly vulnerable to government inaction or hesitation.”

The Edmonton Courthouse. Since the accession of Charles III. the Court of Queen’s Bench is referred to as the Court of King’s Bench. Photo: Wikipedia Commons

Mahe or Mahe?

In her 17-page decision, Judge April Grosse refers to the matter 17 times mah.

When Jean‑Claude Mahé, Angéline Martel and Paul Dubé asked that Court of Queen’s Benchthen to Alberta Court of Appeals To determine the degree of “management and control” over a French-language school that should be afforded to parents who belong to Edmonton’s official linguistic minority, they lost the French accent that appeared in each of their names.

As the Chief Justice Brian Dickson The unanimous decision of the Supreme Court of Canada listed the case without emphasis: c. alberta, [1990] 1 SCR342.

Normally, the text of a judgment can only be changed by the judge who made that decision. Can the higher courts use their inherent powers to decide that they will deal with the case henceforth? mahe and no Mahe?

Jordan Johnson

Award-winning entrepreneur. Baconaholic. Food advocate. Wannabe beer maven. Twitter ninja.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *