QS MPs swear allegiance to king… in bid to make oath optional | Elections Quebec 2022

The political formation explains that they have changed their minds in order to introduce a new bill making the oath to the king optional.

That’s what the party says to introduce the billhis deputies will soon complete their swearing-inwithout specifying the date when they will take the oath to the king.

On Tuesday, the President of the National Assembly decided that if you wanted to take part in parliamentary work, you really had to swear allegiance to the head of state of Canada, King Charles III.

Swearing by the king is pointless and archaic. That has no place in our democracy. The President of the Assembly’s decision is very disappointing, but it is clear and unchallengeable. To finally correct this injustice, we must pass a lawwe read in the press release.

Solidarity declare that they don’t Confidence in the two federalist parties [la Coalition avenir Québec et le Parti libéral du Québec, NDLR] to end this practice.

We will take charge, enter the Blue Room and make sure no one else has to take that humiliating oath. »

A quote from Gabriel Nadeau-Dubois, co-speaker of Québec solidaire

Mr. Nadeau-Dubois is committed to working with the Parti Québécois solve the current impasse.

We are ready to make a motion to allow all MPs to sit without the controversial oath […] But you have to sit down for thatadded the parliamentary leader of Quebec Solidaire.

In addition, Mr Nadeau-Dubois pointed this out Pressure from Québec solidaire and the Parti Québécois made it possible to obtain the pledge of the CAQ quickly bring in an invoice and that’s good.

But who ensures that this law is passed in the Blue Hall if there is no separatist there? »

A quote from Gabriel Nadeau-Dubois, co-speaker of Québec solidaire

A final decision

The decision of the President of the National Assembly is clear and incontestable; There is no mechanism to appealrepeated Mr. Nadeau-Dubois on the show All in one morningon ICI Premiere.

Starring in this film is out of the question [la possibilité que les députés n’ayant pas prêté serment au roi soient expulsés, NDLR]so we take our responsibility, we hold our noseshe added.

And even if the CAQ intends to present a bill for the voluntary taking of the oath, QS intends to do so at the earliest opportunity.

If you want to change the rules of the game, you can’t trust others; You have to do it yourselfcontinued the Quebec Solidaire co-spokesman.

Mr Nadeau-Dubois thinks so tooIt’s much easier to put pressure on the government by having your feet in the Blue Room than standing in the hallway.

Quebec Solidaire parliamentary leader Alexandre Leduc also spoke to his CAQ counterpart Simon Jolin-Barrette on Wednesday to ensure things move faster.

However, there is no guarantee that the Legault government will hasten the passage of an Oath of the King bill, whether from its own ranks or from the opposition benches.

PQ denounces PLQ ready to ‘discuss possibility’

In a series of tweets published on Thursday, PQ MP Pascal Bérubé contradicted Gabriel Nadeau-Dubois’ claim that QS had contacted the Parti Québécois for the purpose of cooperation.

[Mercredi]the PQ QS offered to work together on a joint application text and to form a common front to convince the CAQ to accept this application and thus finally settle this question.writes Mr. Bérubé.

the latter argues QS decided not to work with the PQ on this issue, but instead to mobilize the CAQ on this issue, he continues. A file which, adds Mr. Bérubé, occurs simultaneously [dans le cadre des] Negotiations on recognition budgets for factionsanother important topic for QS and the PQ.

Contrary to what Gabriel Nadeau-Dubois claims in the media, his vocation [de mercredi] was not a collaboration, but rather confronting us with a fait accompli. »

A quote from Pascal Bérubé, PQ MP for Matane-Matapédia

We take note of this decision and are continuing our negotiations with the CAQ on this issue.closes Mr. Bérubé in his row.

For its part, the Quebec Liberal Party claims it is ready to discuss the possibility of making the oath to the king optional.

We will, if necessary, analyze any bill that the government will present on this subject. And we will participate in the legislative process, as we have always doneshows the statement from the office of Liberal leader Dominique Anglade.

Andrea Hunt

Twitter enthusiast. Organizer. Explorer. Reader. Zombie aficionado. Tv specialist. Thinker. Incurable internet maven.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *