OTTAWA – Former Haitian Prime Minister Laurent Lamothe is asking a judge to lift sanctions Canada imposed on him for allegations he supported gangs that sparked a humanitarian crisis in Haiti.

Mr. Lamothe filed a motion in federal court in Montreal on Thursday, arguing that the sanctions were an arbitrary decision that did not give him an opportunity to present his version of the facts.

He is asking to have his name removed from the sanctions list and to have the documents Ottawa used to make his decision.

In recent months, Canada has sanctioned 13 members of Haiti’s political and business elite and froze all Canadian assets they own in a bid to stem the flow of money and arms to criminal organizations.

Violent and belligerent gangs have seized control of the capital, Port-au-Prince, sexually abusing women and children while restricting access to health care, electricity and clean water.

The Liberals say their sanctions are aimed at isolating the political leaders who created the conditions for the chaos to seek consensus in Haiti on how foreign governments can help.

Haiti’s unelected prime minister has called for international military intervention to allow humanitarian aid to be delivered and create favorable conditions for elections. The United States argued that Canada would be an ideal country to lead such a force.

Still, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Ottawa does not want another failed intervention in Haiti after numerous United Nations operations to stabilize the country.

Foreign Secretary Mélanie Joly on November 17 sanctioned Mr Lamothe along with two others whom Ottawa accused of “using their status as former or current public officials to protect and enable the illegal activities of armed criminal gangs, including through money laundering and other acts of corruption”.

Lamothe has publicly denied being disciplined after learning the news on social media and said he worked to curb organized crime in Haiti during his tenure as prime minister from mid-2012 to late 2014.

His lawyer argues that “the Foreign Secretary’s recommendation is therefore unfounded, either in law or in fact.”